Skip to content
PROOF // Aerospace & Defense Manufacturing ITAR-adjacent aerospace & defense contract manufacturer · on-prem and air-gapped data requirements · multi-program supplier base
← All Proof

CHAPTER 01 · OVERVIEW

A Defense Manufacturer's Supply Chain and Security, Rebuilt Around AI

One working session surfaced how much risk was sitting in spreadsheets nobody cross-checked. Today, supplier risk, software risk, and facility access all get watched the same way, every day.

A single-source supplier's financial trouble surfaced two weeks after it started — and only because someone happened to read the news. By then, a program milestone was already at risk. Nothing sensitive could touch a public AI model, so nobody had tried automating any of this.

Industry

Aerospace & Defense Manufacturing

Operation

ITAR-adjacent aerospace & defense contract manufacturer · on-prem and air-gapped data requirements · multi-program supplier base

Systems in place

ERP · PLM · SharePoint · supplier portals · badge/access control

Scope

3 facilities in scope

WHAT SOLVING THIS REALLY MEANT

This Wasn't About a Dashboard

The program-risk blind spot

A supplier problem that surfaces late doesn't just cost money — it can slip a program milestone that's contractually and reputationally expensive to miss.

The software supply chain nobody audited

Every open-source component shipped inside a deliverable is a component the government can ask about. Without a real answer, that's a finding, not a conversation.

The access-control audit that has to hold up

Physical access to a controlled facility has to be defensible after the fact, not just approved in the moment.

HOW AN ENGAGEMENT RUNS

Same Three Phases, Every Time

01 · Day 0

Discover

One working day, on-site and on the record. We interview people, review the compliance boundary, map how risk actually gets caught today, and score what we find.

02 · Weeks 1–8

Build

The first system shipped inside the program office's approved boundary — no data leaves, no new platform to certify.

03 · Ongoing

Operate

We tune it, add the next workflow, and keep the compliance posture current as real usage comes in.

OPERATING BENCHMARK

30 days

from the first working session to the first AI system live and cleared for use

$7.8M

modeled annual value, once every wave is live

3

Facilities in scope, one team

Annual Value Created

Cost reduction $3.5M · 45%
Program schedule protection $1.6M · 20%
Risk mitigation $2.7M · 35%

Modeled from the discovery baseline. Value is captured across cost reduction, revenue growth, and risk mitigation — not cost alone.

CHAPTER 01 OF 5

UP NEXT · DISCOVER

See exactly what we found on the floor — everywhere we looked, and the one workflow we picked first.

Continue to Discover